AI Governance & Security. Gated before it ships.
Human gates, audit trails and per-client isolation, proven in defence, healthcare, BFSI and government. Governance designed around your risk posture — not bolted on after the agents are already running.
EVERY LAYER GATED · EVERY ARTIFACT TRACEDWhat this engagement is
Most AI governance arrives as a document nobody can enforce — a policy that describes what agents should do, written after they already do it.This engagement inverts that. We classify every action an agent could take by what it touches and what it costs when it is wrong, then place a human checkpoint at each boundary that matters, with the approving role named before anything goes live.
The work covers gate design, per-client isolation, credential vaulting and tool-level token scopes, and the audit trail that lets a decision be reconstructed months later — inputs, rationale, policy version, approver. What you get is not a framework to interpret; it is enforcement wired into the same substrate that produces the answers.
The numbers behind it
What ships
Human checkpoint design
Every agent action classified by blast radius, with the gate placed where a person must decide.
Per-client isolation
Sealed workspaces — separate credentials, separate model context. One client's data never informs another's.
Credential vault
Secrets injected at runtime, scoped to a single task, revoked the moment it completes.
Tool-level token scopes
One tool, one action, one dataset per token. No standing keys, no blast radius if one leaks.
Audit trail
Every run, every rationale, every override — recorded against the policy version that produced it.
Escalation ownership
Named owners per exception type, with routing and SLAs agreed before anything goes live.
How the engagement runs
Six phases from an unclassified action list to a gated, auditable production run.
Proof from production
Governance that survived the audit, not just the demo
“Every automated decision could be reconstructed months later — inputs, rationale, policy version and the person who approved the exception. The audit took days, not quarters.”
Where it's been delivered
6 engagements delivered across 5 clients.
Public sector
Ministry of DefenceDefence & government systems, transformation under governance controls.
Questions teams ask
Does governance slow the agents down?
Only where it should. Gates are placed by blast radius, so low-risk actions run unattended and the ones that touch money, customers or records wait for a person. Teams usually find throughput goes up, because nobody has to review everything defensively.
How is this different from your Security & Governance page?
That page describes how our platform is built. This is an engagement: we classify your actions, place your gates, wire your audit trail and hand over the evidence pack — governance designed around your risk posture, not ours.
What do auditors actually receive?
A reconstructable record for every run: the inputs, the rationale, the policy version in force, the approver where a gate applied, and the write-back to your system of record. Mapped to the control framework you already report against.
Can agents ever hold our credentials?
No. Secrets live in an encrypted vault and are injected at runtime, scoped to a single task and revoked when it completes. An agent never sees a raw secret and never holds a standing key.
Nothing reaches the real world without a defined escalation path — and every exception lands with a person whose name was agreed before the agent ever ran.
Pick your function. Own the intelligence behind it.
Discover one opportunity, engineer one capability and deliver one measurable outcome, then scale.